LOGAN Tools and Tools Tested

SNV

Tools Pros Cons Used in Logan
Mutect2 Part of GATK best practices x
Strelka Fast Paired only x
Muse Fast Paired only, can't be parallelized x
Lofreq Low frequency variants Slow,Paired only x
Vardict Fast Lower accuracy x
Varscan Fast Lower accuracy x
Octopus Accurate Slow,High memory x
Deepsomatic Relatively fast Trained on human data x

Structural Variants

Tools Pros Cons Approach Used in Logan
Manta Accurate, fast graph-based x
SVABA Deletion detection local assembly+ multiple alignment x
GRIDSS Provides blacklist Slow, part of HMFtools pipeline Break end assembly (discordant +split) x

Manta, GridSS, and SvABA are based on read-pairs, split-reads, and local-assemblies.
References Joe et al

Copy Number

Tools Pros Cons Used in Logan
Purple Complete workflow Doesn't support mm10, requires SV,SNV calls as well x
Sequenza Purity/Ploidy x
FREEC Fast No Purity/Ploidy Estimatation x
ASCAT Fast, Purity/Ploidy x
CNVkit Fast No Purity/Ploidy Estimatation x
PureCN Tumor only Needs Panel of Normals on Sequencing

Germline

Tools Pros Cons Used in Logan
Deepvariant Fast, most accurate Model trained on human genomes (May not support mm10) x